Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 P2D 758 - Kemp v. Murray

Kemp v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2007

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

80198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hauer v. Bt Advisors, Inc. · Nordling v. Johnston · Stevens v. St. Joseph's Hospital · St. Pierre v. Edmonds · Shaw v. Jeppson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nless [the] plaintiff could show that he suffered direct injury personally, as distinguished from injury to the partnership, [the] complaint [would be] properly dismissed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A joint venture is subject to the same rules as a partnership.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “spawn multiple litigation among the partnership, the individual partners, and [D]efendants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.