State v. Page’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2011
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 643 So. 2d 1289 - State v. Kershaw · 389 So. 2d 1328 - State v. Williamson · 610 So. 2d 127 - State v. Cavazos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the intent to commit a felony or theft ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the error violates fundamental requirements of due process; and (2) the trial record is sufficient to establish the error without the need for a post-trial evidentiary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cedrington
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.