Blasco v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2018
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Andrijevic v. Kelleran · Ward v. Sentry Title Co. · In Re Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 · 510 So. 2d 857 - Craig v. State · 350 So. 2d 462 - Delap v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unfortunately, because the notes are lost, and because the trial court’s valiant attempt at reconstruction in the face of vague memories still leaves the record unresolved, we do not know, and are not capable of knowing, whether any reversible error was committed during rebuttal. For this reason we reverse the conviction and remand this matter for a new trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · Bodie v. State“court reporter's stenographic notes of the State's rebuttal witnesses were lost, and the reconstructed record is insufficient to provide meaningful appellate review”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barber v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.