Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 SO2D 1171 - State v. Young

State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

131
cited by 131 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

131 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 716 So. 2d 36 - State v. Jordan (1998), 962 So. 2d 1214 - State v. Foster (2007)

131 state decisions

510199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bordenkircher v. Hayes · 419 So. 2d 844 - State v. Jett · State v. Smack · 412 So. 2d 1335 - State v. Bell · State v. Butler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant cannot appeal or seek review of a sentence imposed in conformity with a plea agreement which was set forth in the record at the time of the plea.”
    32 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is clear the legislature intended La.C.Cr.P. art. 881.2(A)(2) to apply to plea agreements involving both specific sentences and sentencing caps.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] sentence in a particular case, which is acceptable to the prosecutor, defense counsel, and the trial court, should not be subjected to scrutiny by a reviewing court.... A court may, but is not required to, consider the designated sentence range of the offender and the typicality of the case in deciding whether or not to accept a guilty plea with a recommended sentence. If the recommendation is made part of the record of the plea, and the sentence falls within the scope of the recommendation, the sentence is unreviewable under ... Article 881.2.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.