Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

680 So. 2d 454

Degon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 19, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-01-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1999

1 state decisions

Relies on 634 So. 2d 618 - Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Herre · 474 So. 2d 417 - Barr v. State · Brown v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-01-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm without further discussion the revocation of appellant’s probation. However, we vacate appellant’s sentence because the trial court did not have before it a score-sheet at the time of sentencing, and it cannot be determined whether appellant received a guidelines sentence absent a scoresheet. E.g., Brown v. State, 623 So.2d 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So.2d 627 (Fla.1994); Barr v. State, 474 So.2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). On remand, the trial court is directed to resentence appellant, with reference to a properly prepared scoresheet.

¶2AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

ERVIN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
/680/so2d/454 · .json · Public domain