Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

680 So. 2d 454

Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 19, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-01-19

Relies on Turner v. State · 619 So. 2d 994 - Smith v. State · Davis v. State

Decided 1996-01-19

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant is not entitled to credit for time served in various probation and restitution centers. See Smith v. State, 619 So.2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Turner v. State, 395 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). However, the judgment must be corrected to reflect conviction of a third-degree felony rather than a second-degree felony. Finally, the trial court erroneously revoked appellant’s probation and sentenced him to time served on a misdemeanor offense for which the sixty-day probationary term had expired. The judgment should also be corrected to so re-*455fleet. Appellant need not be present for correction of Ms sentence. Davis v. State, 387 So.2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Judgment affirmed; sentence vacated in part and remanded for correction.

BOOTH, JOANOS and BENTON, JJ., concur.
/680/so2d/454 · .json · Public domain