Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

680 So. 2d 469

Emlet v. Emlet

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-03-13

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1998

3 state decisions

Relies on Watford v. Watford

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-03-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Former Wife appeals1 the parties’ final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm all portions of the trial court’s order other than the award to Former Wife of the enhanced portion of Former Husband’s interest in the medical center partnership. See Watford v. Watford, 652 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). On remand, we direct the trial court to award the enhanced partnership interest to Former Husband and to award Former Wife a marital asset of equivalent value.

¶2REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

¶3. We affirm wiffiout comment the issues raised in Former Husband’s cross-appeal.

/680/so2d/469 · .json · Public domain