¶1This cause is remanded for correction of the restitution order to reflect the amount of restitution orally pronounced. See Trueblood v. State, 635 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (“It is well-settled that the oral pronouncement of a sentence prevails over the written judgment and sentence form.”). See also R.S. v. State, 664 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 2d *536DCA 1995) (remanding for correction of restitution order to reflect amount orally pronounced at sentencing). The trial court orally imposed restitution of $200. Apparently due to a scrivener’s error, the written order imposes a restitution amount of $2,000.
680 So. 2d 535
Graham v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 13, 1996
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-06-13
Relies on 635 So. 2d 1024 - Trueblood v. State · 664 So. 2d 1113 - Taylor v. State
Decided 1996-06-13