Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 SO2D 567 - Chadwick v. State

Chadwick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2011

10 state decisions

70199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Olden v. Kentucky · 616 So. 2d 1129 - Mosley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the right to a full and fair opportunity to cross-examine prosecution witnesses in order to show their bias or motive to be untruthful.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.