680 So. 2d 592 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. Gentry · Coney v. State · 431 So. 2d 986 - Migliore v. City of Lauderhill · 413 So. 2d 1175 - Francis v. State · 189 So. 2d 890 - Duggan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]either a written nor oral interpretation of the inaudible portions of the tape recording is admissible unless such interpretation is properly authenticated by a person having personal knowledge of the contents of the tape recording or by an expert witness skilled in interpreting inaudible tape recordings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hunt v. State“We disagree with the state's assertion that Wilson's failure to interpose a timely objection to being excluded from this side bar is fatal to appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carmichael v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.