Vo v. Bui

Bang Thi VO, Appellant, v. Trung Quang BUI, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 25, 1996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-09-25

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“requiring the wife to undergo a psychological evaluation .... will not be remediable on appeal”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 856 So. 2d 6 - Olges v. Dougherty

Relies on 601 So. 2d 291 - Pariser v. Pariser · 670 So. 2d 1032 - Elder v. Carter

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-09-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2014

7 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Donald R. Gillette, Tampa, for Appellant.

¶2Nina M. Hanson and Catherine W. Real of Muga & Real, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The order in this case, requiring the wife to undergo a psychological evaluation, is not an appealable nonfinal order. See Pariser v. Pariser,601 So.2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Because the alleged harm will not be remediable on appeal, we treat the instant case as a petition for writ of certiorari. Pariser. We conclude that the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law; therefore, we deny the writ. See Elder v. Carter,670 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

¶5PARKER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.