Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

680 So. 2d 635

Alexander v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-10-16

Relies on 608 So. 2d 93 - Ricardo v. State

Decided 1996-10-16

FARMER, Judge.

¶1We affirm defendant’s convictions for armed robbery and dealing in stolen property, but remand the latter for resentencing. The sentencing scoresheet erroneously listed defendant’s armed robbery conviction, for which he was sentenced as a habitual offender, as the primary offense. See Ricardo v. State, 608 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

GUNTHER, C.J., and POLEN, J., concur.
/680/so2d/635 · .json · Public domain