Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 So. 2d 64 - State v. Mitchell

680 So. 2d 64 - State v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 428 So. 2d 444 - State v. Seiss · 611 So. 2d 1381 - State v. Knight · 650 So. 2d 354 - State v. Bond · State v. Addison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cannot be manipulated to obstruct the orderly procedure of the courts and cannot be used to interfere with the fair administration of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “must exercise his right to counsel of his choice at a reasonable time, in a reasonable manner and at an appropriate stage of the proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.