Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 So. 2d 69 - Cain v. Aquarius Builders, Inc.

680 So. 2d 69 - Cain v. Aquarius Builders, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2010

7 state decisions

50199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hildebrand v. Social Security Administration · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell · 593 So. 2d 357 - Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc. · 639 So. 2d 216 - Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv. · 454 So. 2d 1113 - Johnson v. Ins. Co. of N. America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A stipulation has the effect of a judicial admission or confession which binds all parties and the court. Stipulations between the parties in a specific case are binding on the trial court when not in derogation of law, and are the law of the case. La. C.C. art. 1853; R J. D’Hemecourt Petroleum v. McNamara, 444 So.2d 600 (La.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 820 , 105 S.Ct. 92 , 83 L.Ed.2d 39 (1984); Comberrel v. Basford, 550 So.2d 1356 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989), writ[s] denied, 556 So.2d 1284 , 1285, 1286 (La.1990). ^Accordingly, the joint trial stipulation entered into by the parties in the present case had the effect of a judicial confession binding both the parties and the court. [[Image here]] The correctness of a judicial admission cannot later be denied when the party, which the admission benefitted, relied upon it to his or her detriment. Crawford v. Deshotels, 359 So.2d 118 (La.1978); Dolsen v. City of New Orleans, 559 So.2d 50 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990). Here, the plaintiff relied on the stipulation that causation was not an issue at trial, and that he was not required to prove causation at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A final judgment may be amended by the trial court at any time, with or without notice, on its own motion or on the motion of any party: (1) To alter the phraseology of the judgment, but not the substance; or (2) To correct errors of calculation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.