Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2013
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roy v. Gravel · Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A. · Sellers v. Sanders · 582 So. 2d 428 - Luckett v. State · 554 So. 2d 313 - Trotter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a post-conviction collateral relief petition which meets basic requirements is sufficient to mandate an evidentiary hearing unless it appears beyond a doubt that the petitioner can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Frierson v. State · Rivers v. State“[Defendant's] petition is only supported by his affidavit. There is no affidavit from his attorney or anyone else involved with his plea. [He] did not make the requisite showing for an evidentiary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.