Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 SW2D 150 - State v. Babb

State v. Babb’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably State v. Chambers (1995), Strong v. State (2008)

29 state decisions

1101984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mattox v. United States · Holmgren v. United States · Wheaton v. United States · Oborn v. State · State v. Underwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is perfectly settled, that jurors speak through their verdict, and they cannot be allowed to violate the secrets of the jury room, and tell of any partiality or misconduct that transpired there, nor speak of the motives which induced or operated to produce the verdict.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... where a motion for a new trial is made on account of communications to the jury during their deliberations, there is a rebut-table legal presumption that they were prejudicial to the moving party, that this presumption may in some cases be overcome by evidence, and that where competent evidence is offered it is the duty of the trial court to hear and consider it, and that when it does so, and decides a motion thereon, its decision is discretionary, and is reviewable ... [on appeal] for abuse of discretion only.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.