Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 SW2D 258 - State v. Granger

State v. Granger’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1988
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · United States v. MacDonald · Dillingham v. United States · State v. Buckles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The length of delay is to some extent a triggering mechanism. Until there is some delay which is presumptively prejudicial, there is no necessity for inquiry into the other factors that go into the balance. Nevertheless, because of the imprecision of the right to speedy trial, the length of delay that will provoke such an inquiry is necessarily dependent upon the peculiar circumstances of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.