Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 SW2D 69 - Verble v. Coffman

Verble v. Coffman’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Meaders v. Biskamp · Amoco Production Co. v. Alexander · Montgomery v. Rittersbacher · Standard Oil Company of Texas v. Donald · Ruiz v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We hold that a defensive interpleader, brought after the institution of a suit to recover the disputed funds, is not a defense to the award of attorneys’ fees.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We hold that a suit for damages for breach of an oil and gas lease is a suit on a contract within the purview of art. 2226.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““He cites no authority for this assertion and we find none.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.