Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 681 A2D 1102 - Wright v. Hodges

Wright v. Hodges’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2018

12 state decisions

50199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walton v. Arizona · Kelley v. Everglades Drainage District · California Department of Human Resources Development v. Java · Ethel Javins v. First National Realty Corporation, Rudolph Saunders v. First National Realty Corporation, Stanley Gross v. First National Realty Corporation · Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nder Super. Ct. Civ. R. 52(a), the trial court in a nonjury case is required to state sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law to permit meaningful appellate review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.