Hoston v. Silbert’s Empirical Analysis
681 F.2d 876 · 1982
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Arbour v. Jenkins (1990), Trevino v. Ortega (1998)
18 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Muniz · Lyon v. Carey · International Distributing Corporation, a Maryland Corporation v. American District Telegraph Company, International Distributing Corporation, a Maryland Corporation v. American District Telegraph Company, a West Virginia Corporation v. George E. Hines, Walter T. Smith, Jr · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. Reddick · Dilli v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“foreseeability must be combined with a purpose to further the employer's interest”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“investigative or law enforcement officer”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Cane v. Burger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.