Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 681 F.2d 924 - Sun Petroleum Products Co. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 8-901

Sun Petroleum Products Co. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 8-901’s Empirical Analysis

681 F.2d 924 · 1982

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
April 1987
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Fletcher · Mobil Oil Corporation 81-2582 81-2583 v. Independent Oil Workers Union · NF&M Corp. v. United Steelworkers · Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local 195 v. Cross Bros. Meat Packers, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when an arbitrator's opinion is subject to varying interpretations, a court may not deny enforcement of the arbitrator's award as long as one interpretation of the opinion suggests the award does draw its essence from the parties' agreement”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the interpretation can in any rational way be derived from the agreement, viewed in the light of its language, its context and any other indicia of the parties' intention; only where there is a manifest disregard of the agreement, totally unsupported by principles of contract construction and the law of the shop, may a reviewing court disturb the award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.