Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 681 F.3d 368 - Mann v. Castiel

Mann v. Castiel’s Empirical Analysis

681 F.3d 368 · 2012

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 35 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co. · Mississippi Pub Corporation v. Murphree · Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc. · Henderson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The party on whose behalf service of process is made has the burden of establishing its validity when challenged; to do so, she must demonstrate that the procedure employed to deliver the papers satisfied the requirements of the relevant portions of Rule 4 and any other applicable provision of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when a party seeks affirmative relief from a court, it normally submits itself to the jurisdiction of the court with respect to the adjudication of claims arising from the same subject matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.