Davis v. Billington’s Empirical Analysis
681 F.3d 377 · 2012
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 2 U.S.C. § 1301 (Congressional Accountability Act of 1995) · 2 U.S.C. § 1302 · 2 U.S.C. § 1371 · 2 U.S.C. § 1404 · 2 U.S.C. § 1408 · 2 U.S.C. § 1410
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Mitchell v. Forsyth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The special factors analysis does not turn on whether the statute provides a remedy to the particular plaintiff for the particular claim he or she wishes to pursue.”); see also Spagnola v. Mathis, 859 F.2d 223, 227 (D.C.Cir.1988) (en banc) (explaining that what matters is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Congress's choice to omit damages remedies for claimants in [plaintiff-appellee's] posture was a deliberate one”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is not about ensuring that every violation of a constitutional right is vindicated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.