Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 681 NE2D 1105 - Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

37 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Francis v. Franklin · Lindsay v. Beneficial Reinsurance Co. · Ortiz v. State · Bivins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We rejected these arguments in Part I and Part ILD n. 5. Our standard for review of sufficiency claims is well settled. We do not reweigh the evidence or assess the credibility of witnesses. Rather, we look to the evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom that support the verdiet and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “will affirm the conviction if there is probative evidence from which a reasonable jury could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.