Champlain v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Mitchell v. State (2000), Thompson v. State (1997)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Greene v. Massey · Wright v. State · Waller v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if, in view of this dispute, a jury could conclude that the lesser offense was committed but not the greater, then it is reversible error for a trial court not to give an instruction, when requested, on the inherently or factually included lesser offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. State · Brown v. State“A person who ... knowingly or intentionally kills another human being ... commits murder, a felony!, ]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“However, double jeopardy forbids a retrial ... if the reviewing court concludes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction. Champlain v. State , 681 N.E.2d 696 , 702 (Ind. 1997). Evidence is sufficient if the probative evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence could have allowed a reasonable trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Wooden v. State , 657 N.E.2d 109 , 111 (Ind. 1995). In this review, we do not reweigh evidence or assess the credibility of witnesses. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.