Stoll v. Grimm’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2014
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 76 Ill. App. 3d 638 - Posner v. Davis · DeHaan v. DeHaan · Scott v. Bodor, Inc. · 92 Ohio App. 3d 681 - State v. Weiss · 156 Ind. App. 233 - Coffey v. Wininger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“based on the premise that there are situations which might not amount to actual fraud, but which are 'so likely to result in injustice that the law will find a fraud despite the absence of fraudulent intent.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Stoll v. Grimm, 681 N.E.2d 749, 757 (Ind. Ct.App.1997) (quoting Scott v. Bodor, Inc., 571 N.E.2d 313, 824 (Ind.Ct.App.1991)). Constructive fraud may be found where one party takes unconscionable advantage of his dominant position in a confidential or fiduciary relationship. Id.; see Hall v. Ind. Dep't of State Revenue, 170 Ind.App. 77, 80 , 351 N.E.2d 35, 38 (1976) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“arises by operation of law from a course of conduct which, if sanctioned by law, would 'secure an unconscionable advantage, irrespective of the existence or evidence of actual intent to defraud”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.