State v. Olhausen’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Id. For an offender to know that he is violating the statute, the offender must know about the event that triggers the duty to register. Id. In this case, the State was required to prove that Alarcon knew that he had left his primary address at the motel because he knew that his living arrangement there had ended. When the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction is challenged on appeal, we review the record”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Alarcon

2. “acting with proper regard for the presumption of innocence and regard for the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty of the charged offense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Alarcon

3. “to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the conviction, is sufficient to allow the jurors to reach their verdict.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Alarcon