State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2025
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ungar v. Sarafite · Coles v. State · Renfro v. State · State v. McCardell · State v. Lamm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... uses a deadly weapon or such means or force likely to produce death or serious bodily injury,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ramon · State v. Alires“[t]he term ‘physical injury1 is equivalent to the term “bodily injury,’ which is defined as 'physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.’” Peterson, 681 P.2d at 1219 . 15 . Defendant contends that even if Mr. Carly’s dizziness is a statutorily-recognized”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ekstrom · State v. Boone“[i]t is not necessary to prove that death or serious bodily injury occurred”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Alires · State v. Ekstrom
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.