Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 681 So. 2d 1023 - State v. Walker

681 So. 2d 1023 - State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably 756 So. 2d 1272 - State v. Roddy (2000), 909 So. 2d 1038 - State v. Bowers (2005)

29 state decisions

210199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Scharffe v. Perkins · Lockhart v. Nelson · Barrett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before a confession can be introduced into evidence, the state must affirmatively prove that it was free and voluntary and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or promises. La. R.S. 15:451; La.C.Cr.P. art. 703 D; State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), 672 So.2d 158, 163 . The state must also establish that an accused who makes a statement during custodial interrogation was first advised of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). See, e.g., State v. Fowlkes, 25,870, p. 7 (La.App.2d Cir. 3/30/94), 634 So.2d 953, 957 . State v. Walker, 28,577 (La.App. 2d Cir.10/4/96), 681 So.2d 1023, 1029 (La. App.2d Cir.1996).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.