Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 681 SO2D 817 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 668 So. 2d 589 - State v. Hart · 378 So. 2d 7 - Rodriguez v. State · 618 So. 2d 734 - Biller v. State · 572 So. 2d 1368 - Larson v. State · Nank v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Further, because the remainder of the condition implies that a felon can possess weapons otherwise prohibited with the consent of his probation officer, that portion is stricken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any dirk, metallic knuckles, slungshot, billie, tear gas gun, chemical weapon or device, or other deadly weapon except a firearm or a common pocketknife.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the portion of the condition that prohibits the carrying of weapons other than those enumerated in section 790.23,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.