Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 494 So. 2d 1143 - Lambrix v. State · 542 So. 2d 1330 - In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 · 487 So. 2d 306 - In re Forfeiture of 1983 Wellcraft Scarab · 534 So. 2d 729 - Medious v. DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AMD MOTOR VEHICLES
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an adversarial preliminary hearing is held, the court shall review the verified affidavit and any other supporting documents and take any testimony to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the property was used, is being used, was attempted to be used, or was intended to be used in violation of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. If probable cause is established, the court shall authorize the seizure or continued seizure of the subject contraband.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.