¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction; however we reverse his sentence as to Count I and remand for correction of the written sentence to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement by deleting “violent” from the habitual felony offender sentence. We also reverse appellant’s sentence as to Count IV on the state’s concession the sentence imposed on Count IV must run concurrently to the sentence imposed on Count I. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994).
681 So. 2d 935
Paul v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 30, 1996
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-10-30
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2010
1 state decisions
Relies on Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-10-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →