Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 681 SW2D 124 - Beier v. State

Beier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2002

4 state decisions

20198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Quinones v. State · Griffin v. State · Carter v. William Sommerville and Son, Inc. · Tarpley v. State · Romo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether there was sufficient evidence to convict Beier [appellant] as a party to distribution [sale] of obscenity is governed by Griffin v. State, 614 S.W.2d 155 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). The relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, any rational fact-finder could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.” 681 S.W.2d at 128 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.