Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 F.2d 1004 - Gipson v. Veterans Administration

Gipson v. Veterans Administration’s Empirical Analysis

682 F.2d 1004 · 1982

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
March 2003
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2003 · most notably Otherson v. Department of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Service (1983), Devine v. White (1983)

29 federal appellate · 2 district ·

330198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2071 · 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 7513 · 5 U.S.C. § 7701 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703

Relies on Connecticut v. Glidden · Terrell v. United States · National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Garment Co. · Wait Radio v. Federal Communications Commission · Brewer v. United States Postal Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so clearly excessive as to constitute an abuse of the agency's discretion,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “hold unlawful and set aside any agency action, findings, or conclusion found to be--(1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) obtained without procedures required by law, rule, or regulation having been followed; or (3) unsupported by substantial evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] reviewing court's function in considering the appropriate sanction for employee misconduct ... is limited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.