Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 F.2d 1070 - Gill v. Hango Ship-Owners/AB

Gill v. Hango Ship-Owners/AB’s Empirical Analysis

682 F.2d 1070 · 1982

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
January 2014
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably Randolph v. Laeisz (1990), Teply v. Mobil Oil Corp. (1988)

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los Santos · United States v. Bailey · Gay v. Ocean Transport & Trading, Ltd. · Tug Ocean Prince, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Yet it is quite possible, it seems to us, that Seattle’s judgment in this respect was so obviously improvident that Scin-dia, if it knew of the defect and that Seattle was continuing to use it, should have realized the winch presented an unreasonable risk of harm to the longshoremen and that in such circumstances it had a duty to intervene and repair the ship’s winch, (footnote eliminated)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]n expert witness for the plaintiff, ... whose qualifications as an expert [were] not in question, [had] made affidavits to the effect that the rolls of paper could not be unloaded without employing tong-like breakout clamps, so that the use of such clamps was inevitable, and that such clamps were inherently dangerous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “should have intervened to stop the loading operation until it could be done with reasonable safety.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.