Junco v. Conover’s Empirical Analysis
682 F.2d 1338 · 1982
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2015
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eisenstadt v. Baker · Corsicana Nat Bank of Corsicana v. Johnson · Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission · Groos National Bank and Clinton Manges v. Comptroller of the Currency, Groos National Bank of San Antonio, Texas, and Clinton Manges v. United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency · 444 F. Supp. 510 - United States v. Corbin Farm Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“deliberately refrained from investigating that which it was his duty to investigate, any resulting violation of the statute must be regarded as 'in effect intentional.' " Id. at 71-72, 40 S.Ct. at 84, 64 L.Ed. 141; see also Atherton v. Anderson, 86 F.2d 518 (6th Cir.1936), rev'd on other grounds, 302 U.S. 643 , 58 S.Ct. 53, 82 L.Ed. 500 (1937); White v. Thomas, 37 F.2d 452 (9th Cir.1930). In assessing the facts surrounding Butcher's "knowledge,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Larimore v. Conover“standard applies to an 1818(b) enforcement proceedings, (a question not determined)--the directors were liable because they had knowledge of the identity of the borrowers, knowledge that the proceeds were to be used by one company, and knowledge of the loan amounts and the bank's loan limits. Apparently, these directors failed to aggregate the loans, as required by Sec. 84. In del Junco, the Court explicitly pointed out that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Larimore v. Conover“(d)irectors of a national bank operate in an area closely regulated by federal law, and cannot maintain ignorance of the law as a defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Larimore v. Conover
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.