Eberle Tanning Company v. Section 63l, Flm Joint Board’s Empirical Analysis
682 F.2d 430 · 1982
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2023
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Bullock v. United States · Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co. · Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers Union · Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n order to arbitrate the particular grievance should not be denied unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an ambiguity concerning the Company's duty to arbitrate its grievances, an ambiguity which we must resolve consistent with federal labor policy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“should the grievance remain unsettled, either party may refer it to a three (3) man Board of Arbitration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.