United States v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
682 F.2d 695 · 1982
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2002
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1623
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Juidice v. Vail · Dunn v. United States · United States v. Williams · United States v. Doulin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may properly be charged in separate counts even though they are all related and arise out of the same transaction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“require different factual proof of falsity,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“irreconcilably contradictory declarations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.