Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 F.2d 711 - Rhodes v. Foster

Rhodes v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis

682 F.2d 711 · 1982

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
February 2005
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably Antonio Richardson v. Michael Bowersox (1999), Griffin v. Delo (1994)

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

140198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Juidice v. Vail · Maggitt v. Wyrick · State v. Pierce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “gross, conspicuously prejudicial or of such import that the trial was fatally infected.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.