Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 F.2d 746 - Fowler v. Parratt

Fowler v. Parratt’s Empirical Analysis

682 F.2d 746 · 1982

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2004

9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

190198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Wainwright v. Sykes · Jackson v. Denno · Holland v. United States · Engle v. Isaac

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.