Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 F.2d 763 - General Teamsters, Auto Truck Drivers & Helpers Local 162 v. Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines

General Teamsters, Auto Truck Drivers & Helpers Local 162 v. Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines’s Empirical Analysis

682 F.2d 763 · 1982

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
May 2007
most recently cited

22 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2007 · most notably Amaro v. Continental Can Co. (1984), Gottheiner United States v. Gottheiner (1983)

22 federal appellate ·

230198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the issue decided in the prior adjudication [is] identical with the one presented in the action in question,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a case based solely on the applicability of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, not upon a statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he Arbitrator did, in fact, use the 'common-law agency test' in arriving at his decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.