Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
682 F.2d 830 · 1982
Citation profile
110 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 213 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Nachwalter v. Christie (1986), Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles (1986)
110 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Quern v. Jordan · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 213 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the time and labor required, (2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, (3) the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly, (4) the preclusion of other employment by the attorney due to acceptance of the case, (5) the customary fee, (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent, (7) time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances, (8) the amount involved and the results obtained, (9) the experience, reputation, and ability of the attorneys, (10) the “undesirability” of the case, (11) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client, and (12) awards in similar cases.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'the evidence on a subsequent trial was substantially different, controlling authority has since made a contrary decision of the law applicable to such issues, or the decision was clearly erroneous and would work a manifest injustice'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“ordinarily precludes a court from re-examining an issue previously decided by the same court ... in the same case.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.