Batchelor v. Cain’s Empirical Analysis
682 F.3d 400 · 2012
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Faretta v. California · Neder v. United States · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Miller-El v. Dretke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); Batchelor v. Cain, 682 F.3d 400, 405 (5th Cir. 2012) (‘‘[T]he denial of the right to self-representation constitutes a structural error that is not subject to harmless error review and instead requires automatic reversal.”); see also United States v. Davila, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2139, 2149 , 186 L.Ed.2d 139 (2013) (listing the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Lathem v. State“not required, in order to avoid waiver, to add anything to the straightforward request that he had already made plain in writing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the trial court should have initiated a colloquy”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.