Felland v. Clifton’s Empirical Analysis
682 F.3d 665 · 2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Calder v. Jones · Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A. · Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the defendant [ ] purposefully availed himself of the privilege of conducting business in the forum state or purposefully directed his activities at the state; (2) the alleged injury must have arisen from the defendant's forum-related activities; and (3) the exercise of jurisdiction must comport with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“make a prima facie showing of jurisdictional facts.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In either case, the ultimate constitutional standard is whether the defendant had 'certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.