Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

682 F.3d 779

Docket No. 11-10182.

United States v. King

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2012.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2012-05-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2013

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-05-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Melinda Haag, U.S. Attorney, Suzanne Miles, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Barbara Valliere, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

¶2Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, Daniel Blank, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

¶3D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00455-WHA-l.

¶4ORDER

¶5KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

¶6Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

¶7Judge NGUYEN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

/682/f3d/779 · .json · Public domain