Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

682 F. App'x 219

Ras. Stefen Harris v. Warden Eagleton

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 27, 2017

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2017-03-27

Decided 2017-03-27

¶1 Unpublished opinions are not -binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶2 Ras. Stefen E. Harris appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and denying relief on his 42 U;S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Warden, No. 0:15-cv-04173-HMH, 2016 WL 4253739 (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3 AFFIRMED

/682/fappx/219 · .json · Public domain