Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 FSUPP 184 - Flute, Inc. v. Rubel

Flute, Inc. v. Rubel’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
September 2012
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2012

1 district ·

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Traguth v. Zuck · Jackson v. Beech · Meehan v. Snow · Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co. · Peters Griffin Woodward, Inc. v. WCSC, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The dissolution of a corporation shall not affect any remedy available to or against such corporation, its directors, officers or shareholders for any right or claim existing or any liability incurred before such dissolution____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.