Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 P2D 1049 - Patterson v. State

Patterson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2022

13 state decisions

8019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission · Jahnke v. State · Scheikofsky v. State · Cullin v. State · Parker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [T]hat the slayer was not at fault in bringing on the difficulty; (2) that he believed, at the time of the killing, that he was in such immediate danger of losing his own life, or of receiving serious bodily injury, as made it necessary to take the life of his assailant; (3) that the circumstances were such to warrant reasonable grounds for such belief in the mind of a reasonable man; (4) that there was no other reasonable method of escaping or otherwise resolving the conflict.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An instruction should not be given if it is not reasonably supported by the evidence, or if it is not based on some theory logically derived from some part of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the accused's testimony must be taken as entirely true”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.