682 So. 2d 1027 - Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 584 So. 2d 426 - Mohr v. State · United States v. Alvarez · 524 So. 2d 313 - Cabello v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prejudice is presumed only if the defendant demonstrates that counsel actively represented conflicting interests and that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that his counsel's performance was deficient, and that the deficiency prejudiced the defense of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McCaleb v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.