¶1We have for review Bemis v. State, 667 So.2d 779 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), based on conflict with Salazar v. State, 665 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), quashed, 679 So.2d 1183 (Fla.1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve the result in Bemisbased on Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996).
¶2It is so ordered.